Janelle’s tweets

The full article is available online, and the abstract is below. Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation? In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps. Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method. Drawing from various source materials like personal journaling and chats with matches, I present two autoethnographic pieces: one focusing on my self-presentation as a dating app researcher, and the other on my own dating app use. I follow these by analyzing my motivations and impression construction in the dating app environment, keeping in mind theoretical insights. I conclude with a discussion into the challenges of an autoethnographic approach to impression management.

Impression Management Dating – Modern-Dating Impression Management: Your Reaction

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF.

Especially for dating sites, impression management has been studied as part of the marketplace metaphor, according to which users allocate an almost economic.

JulieAnn Miller , Purdue University. People often use strategic self-presentation to portray themselves in a favorable light. During the study, participants were led to believe that they would meet a potential dating partner, when in reality the potential partner situation was achieved through a cover story. These self-ratings involved two trait variables positive traits and negative traits, based on four specific traits and one interest variable based on two specific interests , which were endorsed in the fictitious partner profile.

It was expected that, among participants whose responses were allegedly shown to their partner public response condition , participants would be more likely to change their self-ratings if they believed the partner moderately liked them moderate perceived liking , compared to if they believed the partner liked them a lot or a little high, low perceived liking, respectively. The results failed to support this hypothesis.

Exploratory analyses for several different moderators are discussed. Off-Campus Purdue Users: To access this dissertation, please log in to our proxy server. Advanced Search. Privacy Copyright. Skip to main content Purdue e-Pubs. Impression management in dating: The effect of perceived partner liking on the use of strategic self-presentation JulieAnn Miller , Purdue University Abstract People often use strategic self-presentation to portray themselves in a favorable light.

Modern-Dating Impression Management: Your Reaction

This research investigates the relationship between online romance, impression management, and sexual behaviors. The data for this research were gathered via an online survey questionnaire and were analyzed through structural equation modeling on a sample of 5, respondents. How to cite: Flygare, Anne Anne Flygare This email address is being protected from spambots.

You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Keeping in mind that the modern-dating culture is built on Impression Management, the impressions you paint on women matter. The next.

HUMAN IT is a multi-disciplinary and scholarly journal with the goal of bringing forth new research and discussion about digital media as communicative, aesthetic, and ludic instruments. We welcome contributions from the humanities, the social, behavioural, and natural sciences, as well as technology. Accepted languages are the Nordic languages and English. Her research and consultancy expertise is in digital communication.

She currently researches how people create and manage impressions on digital media, examining mobile dating apps like Tinder. Font Size. User Username Password Remember me. Abstract People have long used rituals of self-presentation and self-disclosure when looking for a romantic connection, whether they seek a passionate love affair, a spouse or a casual encounter. Mobile dating applications like Tinder have exploded in popularity in recent years. Self-disclosing to matches begins in a technologically mediated environment.

This article provides an overview of literature that has focused on self-presentation and self-disclosure on dating websites and raises questions about whether and how this literature can be applied to new digital matching mobile apps like Tinder. It highlights two current research projects on Tinder users recently conducted in the Netherlands.

Keywords dating apps, impression management, mobile technology, self-disclosure, Tinder.

Impression management online dating

Impression management is a conscious or subconscious process in which people attempt to influence the perceptions of other people about a person, object or event by regulating and controlling information in social interaction. An example of impression management theory in play is in sports such as soccer. At an important game, a player would want to showcase themselves in the best light possible, because there are college recruiters watching.

Impression management. Self-esteem. Online dating. Computer-mediated communication. Mode-switching. a b s t r a c t. Online daters may be aware that online.

Thanks for helping us catch any problems with articles on DeepDyve. We’ll do our best to fix them. Check all that apply – Please note that only the first page is available if you have not selected a reading option after clicking “Read Article”. Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you. To address this issue we conducted an interview study of 41 online dating users, revealing that–contrary to prior work–online daters largely do not want to intentionally deceive their online dating partners because they think such lies would quickly be discovered face-to-face.

Nevertheless, bad first dates were a norm rather than an exception for this study’s participants. In this paper we present various frustrations online daters associate with conveying and forming impressions of potential romantic partners before meeting face-to-face. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design of online dating systems. Categories and Subject Descriptors H.

Impression management

Online dating systems are used by millions of people every year to find a romantic partner, yet many of these users report feeling frustrated by the online dating process. This paper presents an interview study in-progress of online dating system use. Findings from 35 users of a popular online dating system in the United States indicate that, contrary to previous research, users typically do not want to deceive their communication partners in order to appear more attractive.

This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants,exploring how participan | Nicole B. Ellison, Rebecca D. Heino, Jennifer L.

Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation? In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps.

Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method. Drawing from various source materials like personal journaling and chats with matches, I present two autoethnographic pieces: one focusing on my self-presentation as a dating app researcher, and the other on my own dating app use. I follow these by analyzing my motivations and impression construction in the dating app environment, keeping in mind theoretical insights. I conclude with a discussion into the challenges of an autoethnographic approach to impression management.

Her research and consultancy expertise is in digital communication. She currently researches how people create and manage impressions on digital media, examining mobile dating apps. Ward, J. The Qualitative Report , 24 1 , Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons. To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately, you may Download the file to your hard drive.

Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating

If so, how and why? The struggles were between the ages of 19 and 37, and have been users of the system for time spans ranging from 2 months to 5 years. The chosen online dating system allows strong communication through profile pages and private communication through four different methods: The system allows users to search for public profile pages based on specific demographic criteria, online as management, age, location, and ethnicity.

These searches were filtered based on gender, location, and ethnicity in an management to acquire a diverse pool of interview struggles. There are eight different ethnicity choices on the system: With the location criteria remaining constant within 25 miles , there were 16 different search combinations used for finding interview participants 2 genders x 8 ethnicities.

The term “impression management” aptly describes this strategy “to convey an analyzed the patterns of self-presentation and deception on dating sites (e.g.

The Discover y of Grounded. Strategies for Qualitat ive Research. The presentation of self in everyday life. Gend er, online dating, and exaggerated. The effects o f gender,. Personal Relations hips , 27 1 , – Putti ng your best face.

You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Doug Zytko. Sukeshini Grandhi. Quentin Jones. Grandhi there is little work on possibly other forms of Eastern Connecticut State communication in these systems are used for University impression management. This communication reports Willimantic, CT online results from a qualitative study with users grandhis easternct. Online findings from 24 in-depth interviews indicate that primary frustrations with online dating stem from inadequate feedback about conveyed impressions and perceived limitations in forming struggles of others.

Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.

Sign Through. Advanced Search. Article Communication. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Volume Article Contents. Literature Review. About the Authors. Managing Impressions Online: Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Rebecca Heino. Jennifer Gibbs.

Keeping in mind that the modern-dating culture is built on Impression Management, the impressions you paint on women matter. The next couple of articles exclusively tackle this series, which virtually impacts all aspects of your interactions. Fact: The dating pool has become more accessible with the introduction of apps and online media.

Generally, impression management is viewed as a ‘necessary evil’ to negotiate the interactions of a social world which requires a true self that.

Many healthcare providers have been concerned about the extent to which potential kidney donors use impression management or concealment of important information regarding their medical history, current functioning, or other circumstances that could affect whether they are accepted as donors. To date, however, there has been very little empirical examination of these questions. It is also not known whether donors’ use of impression management pre-donation is related to their reactions and adjustment post-donation.

Methods: This study surveyed 76 individuals who had donated a kidney one to six yr previously regarding their use of impression management and their concealing of information during their psychological evaluations. They were also asked about their reactions to the donation and whether they would make the same decision again. In addition, 21 of these donors participated in focus groups that explored these questions in depth.

Results: Many of the kidney donors reported that they possessed very strong motivation to donate and consequently used impression management in their interactions with medical professionals pre-donation. Very few donors, however, indicated that they concealed information during their pre-donation evaluations. The donors’ psychological reactions post-donation were generally positive, and nearly all indicated that they would make the same decision again.

Keywords: impression management; kidney transplant; living donor evaluation; post-donation reactions; psychological factors. Abstract Many healthcare providers have been concerned about the extent to which potential kidney donors use impression management or concealment of important information regarding their medical history, current functioning, or other circumstances that could affect whether they are accepted as donors.

Publication types Evaluation Study.

Self-Presentation and Impression Management in the Online Dating Environment